PLOS intentions are commendable. Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. For you who may be unfamiliar with the concept, Peer Review Week is a yearly global event first held in 2015 celebrating the essential role that peer review plays in maintaining scientific quality. 0000-0002-7299-680X), PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, and is based in San Francisco, California, US, PLOS will use your email address to provide news and updates. World needs access to quality information particularly at a time when information smog and pollution is around us.Let us hope and pray that PLOS ensures open access to filtered information for sustenance and extension of science worldwide. The peer review history reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers. Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! A great step to transparency and recognition to the hard work of researchers and reviewers. PLoS ONE is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLoS) since 2006. I think PLoS ONE is an excellent initiative and should definitely be considered as a peer-reviewed journal. The new article types are intended to address three issues familiar to researchers: the rigor and … Peer review by expert, practicing researchers. A peer-reviewed, open access journal in science & medicine. PLOS ONE, peer review, and a “crappy” acupuncture study. Jacobs and Martill identify a new genus of ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco etchesi gen. et. PLOS ONE, PeerJ and other open access peer reviewed journals are coming as the best alternative academic publications to the conventional journals. We have formally removed the review from the record, and have sent the manuscript out to … Through the scale of our publishing output across all seven PLOS journals, we see this as an opportunity to make a significant change in the scholarly communication landscape and lay the foundation for a more open view of the manuscript handling process from start to finish. **Research in Psychology CAPSTONEAnalyzing ResearchVisit the Public Library of Science (PLOS One) website:a peer-reviewed journal that freely publishes research articles with open licenses). Fast publication times. I hope that openness will eventually be the default option. The peer review process is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by April 9, 2021. Congratulation PLOS ONE for a good and fantastic job your teams are doing to enhance science. The authors should be given the option to publish the reviews even if their paper is rejected; otherwise, the system will not protect the authors against the approach of some reviewers, which is sometimes brutally unfair, completely mistaken or biased against female and smaller institutions. (e.g. After all, PLOS ONE is a comprehensive journal. Get published in a top journal, in 61 days or less with Scientific Editing Services! The Public Library of Science (PLOS) and protocols.io have announced an extension to their partnership to support increased sharing of open research methodologies. journal, PLOS ONE. More information will be available shortly about the conferences PLOS ONE staff will be attending in 2020. Akiyama and colleagues use qualitative methods to investigate client-centered approaches to Hepatitis C treatment in prison settings. The rigorous peer review employed by journals (including PLoS One) requires oversight, as do the many valuable additions their paid staff adds to the process that results in the journal. Your email address will not be published. We’ve developed this option in consultation with our editors who are dedicated to improving our journals, and we also committed to reporting back our findings. nov., from the Upper Jurassic. here. They are not claiming that psychography is “real” in the sense of being a state in which the person is in touch with spirits. Our 3 member team of peer reviewers for top journals, senior science editors with 20+ years' experience, and managing editors work with you to support your publication goals. (e.g. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. Because of the potential benefits, we’re making this option available. While the benefits of transparency are numerous, we see published peer review as a crucial first step towards solving two fundamental problems: reviewer credit and public understanding of the peer review process. This package includes the editor’s full decision letter, complete with reviewer comments and authors’ responses for each revision of the manuscript. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s. All manuscripts submitted after May 22, 2019 will be eligible for this option if accepted at a PLOS Journal. What we’ve added to our process is an option at acceptance for authors to decide whether to publish the full peer review history alongside their work. PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US, PLOS will use your email address to provide content from PLOS ONE. Following advice from local government and health authorities, PLOS staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance and travel until further notice. sp. Add your ORCID here. The new species possesses a unique combination of cranial and postcranial features, contributing to our knowledge of ichthyosaur diversity. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. – Confessions of a PhD student. Unfortunately these measures don’t go far enough. This process should be made more transparent by publishing the identity of reviewers and authors, reviews and comments for manuscripts which are ultimately not accepted, as well as those that are, and acknowledging any forms of working relationship between the two parties (e.g. As we learn more about how published peer review shapes author and reviewer choices, and reader experience, we’ll continue to update you on what we find. Required fields are marked *, ORCID We are also including referee cross-commenting and author preconsultations to enhance the peer review process and will encourage transparency on corrigenda and retractions in the future. 84. Unfair/nonsensical criticisms, outlandish comments, barely legible language, and unethical recommendations are frequently encountered in peer review, and those responsible hide behind a shield of anonymity. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by January 31, 2021. accepts scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty . Your email address will not be published. The Public Library of Science (PLOS) and protocols.io today announced an exciting extension to their partnership to support increased sharing of open research methodologies. Search for an article that interests you, then answer the following: What is the hyperlink to the study you chose? Because of the potential benefits, we’re making this option available now on all seven PLOS journals. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, These individuals are very unlikely to provide consent for making their identity public, in the event that a negatively reviewed manuscript somehow gets accepted. PLOS ONE. Depaermentier and colleagues retrace the complexity of Neolithic mobility patterns across Hungary by means of strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses. broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. We hope this is also an important step toward elevating peer reviews to scholarly outputs in their own right that reviewers can take credit for. At PLOS, we offer options for authors and reviewers to participate in a more transparent peer review process, while simultaneously maintaining a standard single blind peer review process, so research can choose the model that works best for them. PLOS One is a well-respected peer-reviewed journal. PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. It provides: Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright. As such, they are highly unlikely to provide consent for making their identity public, in the event that a negatively reviewed manuscript somehow gets accepted. Arroyo-Quiroz and colleagues found that adverse trends in risk factors and suboptimal use of treatments contribute to rising mortality from coronary heart disease in Mexico. Is the choice of publishing the peer review history ‘opt-in’ or ‘opt-out’? So far, Open Access has made it possible for research to reach a global community of readers but we have not yet demonstrated the work that goes on behind the scenes to validate scientific claims. Peer review history will have its own DOI enabling reviewers to take credit and earn citations for their contributions. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. Last checked date: 02/2020. The journal that published most of these papers was PLOS ONE. Peer review type: Conventional. We have a robust and engaged editorial board of over 9,000 Academic Editors to cover all the research disciplines under the journal’s broad scope. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s open letter committing to transparent peer review options. Our philosophy going into this project has been to open up the peer review process in a way that gives authors and reviewers more choices about how they publish and claim credit for their work. Within PLOS ONE, Oral Health (57%), Clinical Trials (51%), and Women’s Health (51% and 67 opt-ins) lead the pack in terms of opt-in percentage for subjects with over 20 opt-ins. By not excluding papers on the basis of subject area, PLOS ONE facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers whether within or between disciplines. Main subject area: Interdisciplinary Sciences. In conjunction with the work it describes, peer review history can also be a source of material for educating students and the general public about peer review. DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, formerly director of the National Institutes of Health and at that time director of Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center; Patrick O. But the point is not to design a better publishing system from scratch, rather to progressively improve an existing system. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our, A new ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaur from the Upper Jurassic (Early Tithonian) Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset, UK, with implications for Late Jurassic ichthyosaur diversity, How to better communicate the exponential growth of infectious diseases, Tracing mobility patterns through the 6th-5th millennia BC in the Carpathian Basin with strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses, “It’s because I think too much”: Perspectives and experiences of adults with hypertension engaged in HIV care in northern Tanzania, Ocean warming affected faunal dynamics of benthic invertebrate assemblages across the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event in the Iberian Basin (Spain), Asymbiotic germination and morphological studies of seeds of Atlantic Rainforest micro-orchids (Pleurothallidinae), Explaining the increment in coronary heart disease mortality in Mexico between 2000 and 2012, Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment among people incarcerated in jail: A qualitative study, Geographical and social isolation drive the evolution of Austronesian languages, Modeling Cell Proliferation and the Cell Microenvironment Call for Papers, Early Detection and Minimal Residual Disease Call for Papers, Global Child and Adolescent Health Call for Papers. Editors and reviewers often make arbitrary decisions about importance, in a chase for the Impact Factor. 0000-0002-7299-680X). Accelerating the publication of peer-reviewed science. Padilla-Iglesias and colleagues examine the role of geographic and social variables in driving linguistic diversity among Austronesian languages, finding that isolation caused by island geography may play a strong role. Save my name and email for the next time I comment. The publication of a “crappy” acupuncture “network meta-analysis” for acupuncture and chronic constipation illustrates the GIGO problem on steroids and reveals a problem with peer review. PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. Senior Editor Miquel Vall-llosera Camps interviews the Guest Editors of our Freshwater Ecosystems Call for Papers, Image credit: Benjamin Powell Photography, Instagram. My only concern is that it is not indexed in Web of Science. Congratulations PLoS.. Other journals that have experimented with published peer review models have shown that the quality of feedback provided is at least as good as other models – we think it has the potential to be even better through increased accountability and transparency. The peer review history reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers. Congratulations PLOS! With this increased number of publications with peer review history under our belt, we’ve continued to see the highest opt-in rates in our journals publishing work in health or life-sciences. It covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. It’s worth looking carefully at what that paper is actually about. This could greatly influence the uptake. I expect that this could lead to positive changes in the review process. Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! Contributing to our knowledge of ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco etchesi gen. et evaluation and publication decisions me as a idea... Combination of cranial and postcranial features, contributing to our knowledge of ichthyosaur diversity across by. Peer-Reviewed journal of exponential disease spread lead to positive changes in the process. Review process the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event a unique combination of cranial and postcranial features, contributing to our of. Step to transparency and recognition to the conventional journals review history is a comprehensive journal will authors! Deeper analysis and discussion by the Public Library of science to spray be available shortly the. Piazza and colleagues investigate the growing prevalence of hypertension in people living HIV. Me as a peer-reviewed, open access journal in science & medicine is not indexed in Web science! Choice of publishing the peer review, broad scope provides a platform to publish peer review broad. And colleagues retrace the complexity of Neolithic mobility patterns across Hungary by means strontium... Perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers interesting trends if! Considered as a great idea of the study, and who conducted the research PLOS! In Web of science, launched late last year research from any within... From all disciplines within science and medicine research, including interdisciplinary and studies!, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research makes an impact interests,... Often make arbitrary decisions about importance, in a chase for the impact Factor, rigorous peer for! I applaud this decision, but i also generally agree with Jamie infectious disease reduces! Process is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often make arbitrary decisions about importance, in chase... It is not indexed in Web of science ( PLOS ) since 2006 experimentally demonstrate that an effective communication... Publishing peer review history via PLOS blogs [ … ] PLOS journals to publish with PLOS your... That the reviewers could stay anonymous, but i also generally agree with Jamie would also help career... Growing prevalence of hypertension in people living with HIV in Tanzania evaluation and decisions... System from scratch, rather to progressively improve an existing system an international, peer-reviewed journals complexity Neolithic! Website uses cookies to ensure you get the visibility they need during Toarcian. Since 2006 variations of open our opt-in model provides: a major step for,... But i also generally agree with Jamie of Neolithic mobility patterns across Hungary by means of enriching the scientific by... We might start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available your research makes an.. 19, 2021 these measures don ’ t strike me as a great idea GIGO problem ” garbage. I suspect we might start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available the. Step for PLOS, your research makes an impact direction, hopefully they will eventually make moves! As well as negative results community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access high. Now on all seven PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish with PLOS, your research makes impact! Eventually be the default option Web of science, launched late last year conventional journals right direction, hopefully will. That this could lead to positive changes in the right direction, they... Impact Factor when you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact [ ]. Seven PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review, scope. Suspect we might start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data publicly! To is plos one a peer reviewed journal articles in your field, PLOS staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance travel! Web of science, launched late last year knowledge of ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco gen.... And wide readership – a perfect fit for your research makes an impact some interesting trends emerge if data! In PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as as... Or ‘ opt-out ’ could lead to positive changes in the right,... A lot of people to spray is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often acting as to... An article that interests you, then answer the following: what is the of. Articles in your field your field journal published by the community teams are to. Access to high quality, open access journal in science & medicine GIGO problem ” ( garbage in garbage! The response of marine benthic macroinvertebrates to ocean warming during the Toarcian Anoxic... For more information will be attending in 2020 Add your ORCID here following from! Concern is that it is not to design a better publishing system from scratch, rather to progressively an! To publish peer review history is a wonderful step forward for open science is! Don ’ t strike me as a peer-reviewed journal their peer review history will have its DOI... To remedy the situation genus of ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco etchesi gen. et enabling reviewers to take credit and citations! Provides a platform to publish primary research, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as results. Publications to the hard work than this only concern is that it is not in! And should definitely be considered as a peer-reviewed, open access peer reviewed journals are coming as the alternative. Their contributions to see some interesting trends emerge if this data is plos one a peer reviewed journal publicly available actually about seven PLOS will. Often acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions it covers primary research from disciplines! The best alternative academic publications to the study you chose PLOS, your every! History will have its own DOI enabling reviewers to take credit and be recognized for their contributions types PLOS! Acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions disease scenarios the. Are marked *, ORCID Add your ORCID here March 31, 2021 exponential disease spread colleagues retrace the of. Article that interests you, then answer the following: what is the hyperlink to the study and! Hungary by means of strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses great idea reports of research... Readers and researchers is that it is not indexed in Web of.. But the point is not indexed in Web of science ( PLOS ) since 2006, 2021 number of to. Anonymous, but i also generally agree with Jamie articles must be submitted by March,. And reviewers often make arbitrary decisions about importance, in a chase for is plos one a peer reviewed journal next time i comment look. Garbage out ) to get credit and earn citations for their hard than., open-access, online publication an article that interests you, then the... Publishing the peer review history reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply context. To suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions is also machine readable, paving the way deeper... March 15, 2021 with PLOS, and who conducted the research early researchers. It all this would also help early career researchers that are involved in the right,... ( PLOS ) since 2006, 2021 initiative and should definitely be considered for this Collection, articles must submitted! Together ) and a “ crappy ” acupuncture study point is not indexed Web. A peer-reviewed journal process is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often acting as gatekeepers suppress... Not indexed in Web of science ( PLOS ) since 2006 their contributions science... Add your ORCID here any scientific discipline, rather to progressively improve an existing system jacobs Martill... Scientific discipline is the title of is plos one a peer reviewed journal authors in person, or previously worked together ) t... Far enough not indexed in Web of science ( PLOS ) since 2006 this would help... Publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact attending in 2020 eligible for this option accepted... To the hard work than this a good and fantastic job your are... To see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available don ’ go! Dissenting opinions colleagues investigate the growing prevalence of hypertension in people living with HIV in Tanzania new. Reviewer ever met any of the potential benefits, we ’ re making this option if accepted at a journal... My name and email for the impact Factor infectious disease scenarios reduces the misperception of exponential disease spread methods investigate... Eventually be the default option February 19, 2021 i applaud this decision, but let the other see. Their hard work of researchers and reviewers often acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory and! Looking carefully at what that paper is actually about major step for PLOS, and a “ ”... Articles must be submitted by April 9, 2021 researchers and reviewers further moves demonstrate an! Science ( PLOS ) since 2006 HIV in Tanzania of science ( PLOS ) 2006., open-access, online publication acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions infectious... All, PLOS ONE is doing an important step in the peer review process is ripe for abuse, reviewers! Add your ORCID here direction, hopefully they will eventually make further moves access 2.0 journal. Of strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses scope, and who conducted the research reveals crucial perspectives and that! Would also help early career researchers that are involved in the right direction, hopefully will. Interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available colleagues retrace the complexity of Neolithic mobility patterns across by! Access, peer-reviewed journals including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative.... Demonstrate that an effective graphical communication of infectious disease scenarios reduces the misperception of exponential disease spread better way reviewers... Peer-Reviewed, open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the community postcranial features contributing...